Skip to main content
Pixelmatters Logo

Key takeaways

  • Match the partner to what you’re modernizing. A product your customers use every day needs product, design and engineering deciding together. A portfolio of hundreds of applications needs a global SI’s governance.

  • Modernizing only the infrastructure tends to ship the same dated experience on a new stack. For a customer-facing product, the stack, the UX and the AI features have to change together.

  • Accenture, Cognizant and EPAM are built for multi-year, portfolio-wide programs. For a single product, their process and overhead cost more than they protect.

  • For mainframe and COBOL estates, the real risk is a cutover that breaks live behavior, so a verification-first specialist like Mechanical Orchard fits better than a generalist.

  • Choose between replatforming and refactoring before you talk to any partner. Tools speed up the work, but the approach you pick is what narrows the shortlist.

Frequently asked questions

An application modernization company migrates, refactors, or rebuilds legacy software so it runs on modern architecture: cloud-native infrastructure, current frameworks, and maintainable code. Depending on the firm, the work spans portfolio assessment, legacy system migration, monolith decomposition, UX redesign, building AI into the product, and ongoing management of the modernized estate.

The 7 R's are the standard options for each application in a modernization portfolio: retire it, retain it as is, rehost it (lift and shift), relocate it to another cloud platform, replatform it with light optimizations, refactor or re-architect it for cloud-native design, or repurchase it as SaaS. For a customer-facing product, the real choice is usually replatforming vs. refactoring.

None of the companies on this list publish pricing; every engagement is custom quoted based on system complexity, scope, and team size. Expect global SIs to carry the highest rates and multi-year commitments, with specialized firms and studios scoping smaller, product-sized engagements. Always ask how the partner de-risks cost: accelerators, fixed-scope phases, or self-funding models.

It depends on scope. Portfolio-wide enterprise programs at the global SIs typically run multiple years. A focused, product-led modernization is much faster: Pixelmatters revamped Aurum Solutions' on-prem fintech product and launched it on the web in 12 months. Incremental patterns, like the strangler fig approach Thoughtworks popularized, let you ship value long before the program ends.

Both, usually. Assessment and code-conversion platforms accelerate the work, and most firms here bring their own (GenWizard, migVisor, Imogen). But tools do not make architecture decisions, redesign workflows, or manage cutover risk. See our guide to application modernization software for when tooling alone is enough.

Match the partner to the blast radius. If modernization touches hundreds of systems, compliance regimes, and thousands of users, an SI's governance is worth its overhead. If it is one product your customers use every day, a product studio or specialist gives you senior people, faster cycles, and a materially lower bill for the same outcome.


Tiago Coelho

CTO

As CTO of Pixelmatters, Tiago Coelho leads the engineering organization, wrote the handbook and quality standards it ships against, and is rebuilding delivery around AI. He writes on technology strategy and engineering leadership.

Share this article